Allen v. Austrue
Plaintiff: William H. Allen, Jr.
Defendant: Michael J. Austrue
Case Number: 1:2008cv01427
Filed: November 24, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County: Harrison
Presiding Judge: Louis Guirola
Presiding Judge: Robert H. Walker
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:1383 Review of HHS Decision

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER Reversing Decision and granting 9 Motion to Remand Case Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 405(g). Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on 6/2/09. Cleared CJRA-A Flag. (RLW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen v. Austrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William H. Allen, Jr.
Represented By: Ian Lawrence Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Austrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?