Brandon v. North Street, LLC
Plaintiff: Timothy M. Brandon
Defendant: North Street, LLC
Case Number: 1:2008cv01431
Filed: November 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Halil S. Ozerden
Presiding Judge: John M. Roper
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER AND REASONS granting 5 Motion to Remand to State Court. Ordered that this case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Harrison County, First Judicial District. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 2/11/09. (JCH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brandon v. North Street, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy M. Brandon
Represented By: Ross F. Lagarde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: North Street, LLC
Represented By: Russell Stephen Gill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?