Saucedo et al v. Nunes et al
| Miro Aldoman Saucedo, Moises Moreira Santos, Ronivan P Da Luz, David Galdino Da Silva, Francisco Almeida Da Silva, Milton Pereira De Matos, Soni Jose De Oliveira, Tadeu Aparecido Do Nascimento, Gilberto Da Silva Neto, Orides R Nunes, Moiser Pertille and Joaquim Martins De Oliveira |
| Five Star Contractors L.L.C., Knights Marine & Industrial Services, Inc., David Knight and Brian Knight |
| 1:2009cv00268 |
| April 20, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Labor: Fair Standards Office |
| XX Outside US |
| Halil S. Ozerden |
| John M. Roper |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 29:206 Collect Unpaid Wages |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 46 Motion to Strike 44 Amended Complaint; granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 46 Motion to Dismiss 44 Amended Complaint.Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 3/29/2012. (Brown, T.)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 38 Motion for Reconsideration; granting Plaintiffs' 39 Motion for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 8/8/2011. (Brown, T.)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 32 Motion to Dismiss.Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 6/6/2011. (Brown, T.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
