L & F Homes and Development, LLC et al v. City of Gulfport, Mississippi
Plaintiff: L & F Homes and Development, LLC and Larry Mitrenga
Defendant: City of Gulfport, Mississippi
Case Number: 1:2010cv00387
Filed: August 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Southern Office
County: Harrison
Presiding Judge: Halil S. Ozerden
Presiding Judge: John M. Roper
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 768 FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of City of Gulfport, Mississippi against L & F Homes and Development, LLC. The civil action is dismissed with prejudice. All remaining pending motions are rendered moot. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 7/20/12. (RLW)
July 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 755 ORDER granting 593 Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 7/11/2012. (Brown, T.)
July 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 746 ORDER granting 589 Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 7/2/2012. (Brown, T.)
November 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 351 ORDER granting 112 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Punitive Damages Claim; granting in part and denying in part 116 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Claims Not Permitted by the Mississippi Tort Claims Act.Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 11/15/2011. (Brown, T.)
March 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER: the following briefing schedule is imposed: Each party shall submit a motion for summary judgment and memorandum on or before 3/16/11; each party may submit responses to opposing motions on or before 3/30/11; each party may submit a rebuttal o n or before 4/8/11; also ORDER is denying 42 Motion in Limine; denying 44 Motion for Sanctions; denying 48 Motion to Stay/Abate Briefings; denying 44 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 51 Motion for Protective Order; denying 51 Motion to S tay; denying 54 Motion to Reset Preliminary Injunction Hearing; denying 57 Motion to Compel; denying 8 Motion to Dismiss; denying 25 Motion to Compel; denying 26 Motion for Expedited Hearing; parties are granted leave to reassert Motions, if necessary; and case is stayed pending resolution. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 3/3/11 (RLW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: L & F Homes and Development, LLC et al v. City of Gulfport, Mississippi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: L & F Homes and Development, LLC
Represented By: George W. Healy, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry Mitrenga
Represented By: George W. Healy, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Gulfport, Mississippi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?