United States of America v. Hancock Bank Official Check Number 084563463 in the amount of $75,658.00, payable to Billy W. Ladner or Sharon Ladner
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Hancock Bank Official Check Number 084563463 in the amount of $75,658.00, payable to Billy W. Ladner or Sharon Ladner
Case Number: 1:2010cv00504
Filed: October 22, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Southern Office
County: Hancock
Presiding Judge: Halil S. Ozerden
Presiding Judge: John M. Roper
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1345
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Hancock Bank Official Check Number 084563463 in the amount of $75,658.00, payable to Billy W. Ladner or Sharon Ladner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Jason Scott Gilbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hancock Bank Official Check Number 084563463 in the amount of $75,658.00, payable to Billy W. Ladner or Sharon Ladner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?