Robinson v. Saucier et al
Plaintiff: Scooter Robinson
Defendant: Donnie Saucier, Unknown Reggie and David Allison
Case Number: 1:2010cv00556
Filed: December 7, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Southern Office
County: Marshall
Presiding Judge: Halil S. Ozerden
Presiding Judge: John M. Roper
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 199 Memorandum Opinion and Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment or in the alternative, Motion for Reconsideration 196 . Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on May 15, 2014. (NM)
June 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 194 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: adopting 187 Report and Recommendations, granting 171 Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Reta Lumpkin. Plaintiff's objections [190,193] are overfuled. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 6/11/2013 (wld)
March 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 186 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 175 and granting 153 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Paul Fernandez, denying 166 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Scooter Robinson, denying 167 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed b y Scooter Robinson, denying 149 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, granting Motion to Dismiss filed by Russell Miller, Reggie Smith, Mike Johnson, Donnie Saucier, Sherman Gaspar, Joe Garcia, Pearl River County, Rob Williams, Julie Flowers, David Allison, Anthony Hales, denying 162 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Scooter Robinson, denying 169 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Scooter Robinson, denying 163 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Scooter Robinson, denying 170 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Scooter Robinson.Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 3/28/2013. (Brown, T.)
March 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 144 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations 119 . Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 3/20/2012 (YSM)
November 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 115 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION: this Court finds that 49 Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted in part. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Roper on 11/9/2011.(avm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robinson v. Saucier et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scooter Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donnie Saucier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Reggie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Allison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?