Pride v. FEMA et al
Plaintiff: Charles P. Pride
Defendant: FEMA, Male and Female John Does and Unknown Defendants
Case Number: 1:2011cv00022
Filed: January 18, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Southern Office
County: Harrison
Presiding Judge: Halil S. Ozerden
Presiding Judge: John M. Roper
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 180 ORDER denying 178 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 12/5/2013. (HM)
November 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 174 FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of FEMA against Charles P. Pride in the amount of $187.88; and in favor of Jerry Creel, Mike Andrews against Charles P. Pride in the amount of $473.11, for a total judgment in the amount of $660.99, for fees and costs assessed to Pride by 137 Order of the US Magistrate Judge entered on 9/6/13; and ordered that this civil action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 11/15/13. (RLW)
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 161 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Jerry Creel and Mike Andrews' Motion 95 for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 10/30/2013. (HM)
September 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 09/13/2012 (HM)
November 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER denying without prejudice 9 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, denying as moot 12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Immunity Pleading, and granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion for Addition to the Complaint, with Jurisdiction, of Exhibit #1 Second Defendant Police Action, and Additional Discovery. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 11/17/2011 (YSM)
June 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; adopting Report and Recommendations re 3 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 6/13/11. (JCH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pride v. FEMA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FEMA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Male and Female John Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Defendants
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles P. Pride
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?