D. et al v. Picayune School District et al
| J. D., Jr., Jeffery Dixon, Sr., Amy Dixon and J. D. |
| Picayune School District, Cayne Stockstill, J. D. S., M. V. B., N. M. and John Does 1-10 |
| 1:2011cv00514 |
| December 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Southern Office |
| Pearl River |
| John M. Roper |
| Louis Guirola |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
165
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 144 Motion to Dismiss, 144 Motion for Qualified Immunity, which the Court has construed as a Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 146 Motion for Summ ary Judgment. Granted as to the Dixons' federal law claims and denied as to the Dixons' state law claims. The following claims asserted by the Dixons against the School Defendants are dismissed with prejudice: violation of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 19 83, violation of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1985, the right to substantive due process, the right to equal protection, and the Fourth Amendment; denying 155 Motion to Continue; finding as moot 162 Motion to Strike. Ordered that this lawsuit is remanded to the Circuit Court of Pearl River County, Mississippi. A certified copy of this order of remand shall be immediately mailed to the clerk of the state court. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 5/15/13 (RLW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
