Claunch v. Bank of America c/o Charles Holliday et al
| Robert W. Claunch |
| Bank of America c/o Charles Holliday, Bank of America c/o Brian Monihan, Bank of America c/o Bruce Thompson, John Does 1-100 and Jane Does 1-100 |
| 1:2012cv00085 |
| March 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Southern Office |
| Hancock |
| Halil S. Ozerden |
| Robert H. Walker |
| Truth in Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that this civil action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 8/18/14. (RLW)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion 22 to Dismiss Amended Complaint. Charles Holliday, Brian Moynihan, and Bruce Thompson are dismissed from this case without prejudice. The Motion 22 is denied in all other respect s. The Clerk of Court is directed to correct the caption of this case to reflect that Bank of America Corporation is a Defendant. The Clerk of Court shall terminate Bank of America c/o Charles Holliday, Independent Chairman of Board, Bank of America c/o Brian Moynihan, President and C.E.O., and Bank of America c/o Bruce Thompson, Chief Executive Officer as parties. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 06/18/2013 (HM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
