Seahorn Investments, L.L.C. v. Federal Insurance Company et al
| Seahorn Investments, L.L.C. |
| Federal Insurance Company, Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, Maxum Indemnity Company, Steadfast Insurance Company and Alterra Excess & Surplus Insurance Company |
| 1:2013cv00320 |
| August 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Southern Office |
| Hancock |
| Halil S. Ozerden |
| Robert H. Walker |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
283
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Granting 217 Motion to Exclude Testimony of Frank Stuart, Granting in Part and Denying in Part 215 Motion to Exclude Testimony of Michael Gurtler, and Granting in Part and Denying in Part 219 Motion to Exclude Testimony of Richard Lyon. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on September 10, 2015. (NM)
|
|
Filing
112
Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part the 11 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Steadfast Insurance Company, Granting in Part and Denying in Part the 16 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Alterra Excess & Surplus Insurance Company, and Granting in Part and Denying in Part the 33 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Federal Insurance Company and Maxum Indemnity Company. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on September 23, 2014. (NM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
