Arbor Properties, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al
| Plaintiff: |
Arbor Properties, Inc. |
| Defendant: |
Steadfast Insurance Company, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London |
| Case Number: |
1:2014cv00391 |
| Filed: |
October 16, 2014 |
| Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Office: |
Southern Office |
| County: |
XX US, Outside State |
| Presiding Judge: |
Keith Starrett |
| Presiding Judge: |
Robert H. Walker |
| Nature of Suit: |
Insurance |
| Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
| Search for this case: Arbor Properties, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Defendant: Steadfast Insurance Company |
| Represented By: |
William H. Creel, Jr. |
| Represented By: |
Edward J. Currie, Jr. |
| Represented By: |
Joseph W. Gill |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Defendant: Indian Harbor Insurance Company |
| Represented By: |
Joseph W. Gill |
| Represented By: |
Edward J. Currie, Jr. |
| Represented By: |
William H. Creel, Jr. |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Defendant: Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company |
| Represented By: |
Joseph W. Gill |
| Represented By: |
Edward J. Currie, Jr. |
| Represented By: |
William H. Creel, Jr. |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Defendant: QBE Specialty Insurance Company |
| Represented By: |
William H. Creel, Jr. |
| Represented By: |
Edward J. Currie, Jr. |
| Represented By: |
Joseph W. Gill |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London |
| Represented By: |
Joseph W. Gill |
| Represented By: |
Edward J. Currie, Jr. |
| Represented By: |
William H. Creel, Jr. |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
| Plaintiff: Arbor Properties, Inc. |
| Represented By: |
William V. Westbrook, III |
| Represented By: |
Ronald G. Peresich |
| Represented By: |
Michael F. Cavanaugh |
| Search News |
[
Google News
| Marketwatch
| Wall Street Journal
| Financial Times
| New York Times
]
|
| Search Finance |
[
Google Finance
| Yahoo Finance
| Hoovers
| SEC Edgar Filings
]
|
| Search Web |
[
Unicourt
| Justia Dockets
| Legal Web
| Google
| Bing
| Yahoo
| Ask
]
|
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
