Curry v. Synchrony Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff: Christie Curry
Defendant: Synchrony Bank, N.A.
Case Number: 1:2015cv00322
Filed: September 25, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Southern Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: Robert H. Walker
Presiding Judge: Louis Guirola
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting defendant's 5 Motion to Dismiss. Ordered that Plaintiff, Christie Currys request to amend her Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff Curry is ordered to file an Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 11/12/15. (RLW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Curry v. Synchrony Bank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christie Curry
Represented By: Shireen Hormozdi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Synchrony Bank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?