Winslow v. Colvin
David A. Winslow |
Carolyn W. Colvin |
1:2015cv00390 |
November 25, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Southern Office |
Pearl River |
F. Keith Ball |
Halil S. Ozerden |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the opinion and order entered this day, the decision of the Commissioner is reversed, and this matter is remanded to the Commissioner. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 2/8/2017 (wld) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Winslow v. Colvin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David A. Winslow | |
Represented By: | Paul B. Eaglin - PHV |
Represented By: | Mager A. Varnado, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.