Stockstill v. City of Picayune et al
| Jeremy Stockstill |
| City of Picayune, Bryan Dawsey and Chad Prestridge |
| 1:2016cv00004 |
| January 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Southern Office |
| Pearl River |
| John C. Gargiulo |
| Halil S. Ozerden |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER granting 61 Motion for Attorney Fees and Expenses to the extent that $36,521.25 in attorneys fees are awarded and $6081.51 in expenses are awarded. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 12/11/17. (RLW)
|
|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion for Summary Judgment. Stockstills claims against Officer Prestridge and Chief Dawsey in their official capacities are dismissed with prejudice. Portions of Stockstills due process and freedom of speech claims are dismissed with prejudice as set forth herein; and denying 44 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 7/18/17. (RLW)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER granting 27 Motion to Stay Proceedings and Administratively Closing Case for statistical purposes During Pendency of Appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on 3/9/16 (RLW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
