Howard v. Ford Motor Company et al
Howard and Warren Howard |
Ford Motor Company and General Motors LLC |
1:2016cv00127 |
April 14, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Southern Office |
Harrison |
Louis Guirola |
Robert H Walker |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 Report on the Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark Form AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (wld) |
Filing 24 JUDGMENT: judgment is rendered in favor of the defendants. Plaintiff's claims against the defendants are Dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 7/29/2016 (wld) |
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting #8 Motion to Dismiss; granting #18 Motion to Dismiss Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 7/29/2016 (wld) |
Filing 22 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Dismiss , #18 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Warren Howard (wld) |
Docket Annotation as to Doc. #21. This reply should have also been linked to motion #18. All related filings to motions (using the "Responses and Replies" category, with the exception of "Response to Order") should be linked back to the original motion. Court staff has made the correction.(wld) |
Filing 21 REPLY to Response to Motion re #20 Response in Opposition to Motion #18 to Dismiss filed by General Motors LLC (Rayner, W.) Modified on 7/25/2016 (wld). |
Filing 20 RESPONSE in Opposition re #18 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Warren Howard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - US Patent)(JCH) |
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM in Support re #18 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by General Motors LLC (Rayner, W.) |
Filing 18 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) by General Motors LLC (Rayner, W.) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by W. Whitaker Rayner on behalf of General Motors LLC (Rayner, W.) |
Filing 16 Rebuttal re #13 Reply to Response to Motion, #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Warren Howard (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Patent)(wld) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on June 29, 2016 (King, Steve) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Amend. Clerk directed to amend the case caption to substitute General Motors LLC for General Motors Corp. as one of the Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on 6/28/2016 (wld) |
Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ford Motor Company (Alexander, Roderick) |
Pro Hac Vice fee paid by Jason R. Mudd $ 100, receipt number 14643008196 (wld) |
Pro Hac Vice fee paid by Eric A. Buresh $ 100, receipt number 14643008196 (wld) |
Docket Annotation as to Doc. #11 & #12. Any PDF fillable on-line forms once completed should be electronically converted to PDF by printing to the PDF printer. Save the file with an appropriate name in a folder. E-file the electronically converted PDF form, not the form which was filled in and saved. Clerk has converted the PHV motion form so that it may not be modified. Counsel does not need to re-file. (wld) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Jason R. Mudd to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Ford Motor Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" Kansas Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit "B" Missouri Certificate of Good Standing)(Alexander, Roderick) (Main Document 12 replaced on 6/28/2016) (wld). |
Filing 11 MOTION for Eric A. Buresh to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Ford Motor Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" Kansas Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit "B" Missouri Certificate of Good Standing)(Alexander, Roderick) (Main Document 11 replaced on 6/28/2016) (wld). |
Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Warren Howard. (JCH) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ford Motor Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" - Declaration of Thomas Miller)(Alexander, Roderick) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by Ford Motor Company (Alexander, Roderick) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint/Defendant's Name by Warren Howard (wld) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Ford Motor Company (Alexander, Roderick) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Ford Motor Company answer due 6/9/2016. No further written order will issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on May 19, 2016 (King, Steve) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Warren Howard. Ford Motor Company served on 4/28/2016, answer due 5/19/2016. (JCH) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Warren Howard. General Motors Corp. served on 4/25/2016, answer due 5/16/2016. (wld) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of mailing to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office of Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action regarding a Patent or Trademark re #1 Complaint. (wld) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corp. (JCH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corp. (Filing fee $ 400; receipt number 14643007954), filed by Warren Howard. (2 exhibits are on CD and being maintained in court file) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - patent, #3 Exhibit 2 - ford mykey, #4 Exhibit 3 - letters of support, #5 Exhibit 4 - news articles, #6 Exhibit 5 - housing after Katrina, #7 Exhibit 6 - patent information)(JCH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.