Stone Mountain Access Systems, Inc. v. Southern Recycling, L.L.C. et al
| Stone Mountain Access Systems, Inc. |
| Southern Recycling, L.L.C., Letroy Deandre Brooks, Darryl Maurice Raymond and John Does 1 through 30 |
| 1:2016cv00194 |
| June 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Southern Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Halil S. Ozerden |
| Robert H. Walker |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
250
FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Southern Recycling, L.L.C. against Stone Mountain Access Systems, Inc. Ordered that Plaintiff Stone Mountain Access Systems, Inc. claims against Defendant Southern Recycling LLC, are dismissed with prejudice; and Ordered that this civil action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 4/6/18. (RLW)
|
|
Filing
223
Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant Southern Recycling, LLC's Motion 161 for Summary Judgment and Denying Plaintiff Stone Mountain Access Systems, Inc.'s Second Motion 165 for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on March 14, 2018. (BGL)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on 6/29/16. (RLW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
