McReynolds v. Matthews et al
| Aimee McReynolds |
| Thomas M. Matthews, III, Matthews & Matthews, PLLC and John and Jane Does 1 - 5 |
| 1:2016cv00318 |
| August 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Southern Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| John C. Gargiulo |
| Halil S. Ozerden |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
143
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 120 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 1/3/2018. (JD)
|
|
Filing
140
Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion 117 to Strike Plaintiff's Rebuttal Expert and Expert's Supplemental Report. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 11/20/2017. (JD)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER denying 76 Motion to Compel Execution of Medical Waivers ; denying 77 Motion to Compel Attorney Depositions ; denying 78 Motion to Compe l Production of Financial Records ; denying 80 Motion to Extend Discovery Deadline ; denying 82 Motion to Quash or, Alternatively, to Modify the Subpoena Served on Navy Federal Credit Union ; granting in part and denying in part 85 Motion to Compel Matthews to Produce Documents and Things Requested in Requests for Production. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on August 1, 2017.(jg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
