Fells v. City of Gulfport, Mississippi et al
| Prentiss Fells |
| City of Gulfport, Mississippi, Donald Ison, Aaron Fore, Jennifer Krump and Unknown John and Jane Does 1-10 |
| 1:2017cv00202 |
| July 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Southern Office |
| Harrison |
| Robert H. Walker |
| Louis Guirola |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
JUDGMENT in favor of City of Gulfport, Mississippi, Aaron Fore, Donald Ison against Prentiss Fells. Plaintiffs claims against the defendants are dismissed with prejudice; and Plaintiffs claims against John and Jane Does 1-10 are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 3/30/18. (RLW)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 3 Motion to Quash; granting 3 Motion to Dismiss; granting 5 Motion to Dismiss; granting 5 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs claims against the defendants are dismissed as set out above; and that th e plaintiff may file an amended complaint that cures the pleading deficiencies of any claim the Court herein dismissed without prejudice within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Failure to do so will result in final dismissal of the insufficiently pleaded claims. Signed by Chief District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 9/16/17. (RLW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
