Peterson v. Errington
Plaintiff: Justin Dale Peterson
Defendant: Joe Errington
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Case Number: 1:2019cv00089
Filed: February 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Louis Guirola
Referring Judge: Robert H Walker
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2019 Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE by certified mail Executed as to Jim Hood for Joe Errington, served on 4/8/2019, answer due 4/29/2019. (wld)
April 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT TO ANSWER: Respondent Joey Errington, through Jim Hood, shall file an answer or other responsive pleading in this cause within twenty days of the service upon Jim Hood of a copy of this Order. Clerk shall serve, by certified mail, a copy of the Petition #1 and Supplemental Petition #2 along with a copy of this Order upon Jim Hood. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on 4/3/2019 (wld)
April 1, 2019 Filing fee paid: $ 5.00, receipt number 14643011199 (wld)
March 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER *RESTRICTED* denying #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered that Plaintiff has 20 days from the entry of this Order to pay the $5 filing fee. If the filing fee is not received within the 20 day time period, this case may be dismissed. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 3/19/19. (JCH)
March 11, 2019 Filing 4 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Justin Dale Peterson (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(wld)
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: on or before March 28, 2019, petitioner shall complete and file the attached application OR pay the $5.00 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on 2/26/2019 (wld)
February 25, 2019 Filing 2 ATTACHMENT/SUPPLEMENT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Justin Dale Peterson (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(wld)
February 25, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Justin Dale Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A-Circuit Court Opinion and Order, #2 Appendix B-Court of Appeals Documents, #3 Appendix C-Supreme Court of Mississippi Document and Court of Appeals of State of MS Motion, #4 Appendix D-Supreme Court of Mississippi Documents, #5 Envelope, #6 Notice of Assignment)(wld)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peterson v. Errington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Justin Dale Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joe Errington
Represented By: Jim Hood-State Gov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Pro Se Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?