McDowell v. Errington
Plaintiff: Gabriel McDowell
Defendant: Joe Errington
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Case Number: 1:2019cv00282
Filed: May 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Louis Guirola
Referring Judge: Michael T Parker
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Ordered that the Petitioner is granted until on or before July 24, 2019 to fully comply with Order #5 by filing a signed response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 6/25/19. (JCH)
June 18, 2019 Filing 6 Response to Order re #5 ORDER, filed by Gabriel McDowell (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (RLW)
June 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Clerk shall mail Petitioner a copy of Petitioners Response along with a copy of this order; that Petitioner is directed to place his original signature on page 16 (CM/ECF pagination) on the signature line indicated as Signature of Petitioner of Petitioners #4 Response, state the grounds for habeas relief he is asserting in this request for habeas relief, and return the #4 Response with the original signature to this Court on or before 6/26/19. Petitioner is reminded that his pleadings submitted to this Court for filing must have his original signature on such pleadings. See Order for more details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 6/4/19. (RLW)
May 31, 2019 Filing 4 Response to Order re #2 ORDER (Petition is unsigned), filed by Gabriel McDowell (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (RLW)
May 31, 2019 Filing 3 AUTHORIZATION FOR RELEASE OF ACCOUNT INFORMATION AND CERTIFICATE by Gabriel McDowell (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (RLW)
May 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Ordered that Clerk mail to the Petitioner a copy of his filed #1 Petition for habeas relief; that Clerk is directed to mail to Petitioner the attached form used to file a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 along with a copy of this order; and that Petitioner on or before June 6, 2019, complete and file the attached form. See Order for more details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 5/14/19 (Attachments: #1 2254 Petition Form) (RLW)
May 13, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Gabriel McDowell (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment) (RLW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McDowell v. Errington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gabriel McDowell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joe Errington
Represented By: Jim Hood-State Gov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Pro Se Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?