Ready v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
| Rodney Ready |
| Kimberly Echols, Falisha McClendon, Malika Rush, Jeremy St. Julian, Mississippi Department of Corrections and Lyndo Ramero |
| Pro Se Department |
| 1:2019cv00526 |
| August 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Louis Guirola |
| Robert H Walker |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER denying #10 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying #11 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying #11 Motion to Reopen Case. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr., on 10/8/2019. (BR)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, MOTION to Reopen Case by Rodney Ready. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JCH) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by Rodney Ready (Attachments: #1 Administrative Remedy Program Documents, #2 Envelope)(PKS) |
| Filing 9 FINAL JUDGMENT: This civil action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 9/3/19 (PKS) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AS MALICIOUS: that pro se Plaintiff Rodney Ready's Complaint #1 is dismissed with prejudice as malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i). Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 9/3/19 (PKS)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER *RESTRICTED* granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and *RESTRICTED* granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and setting payment schedule as set forth in order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on 9/3/19 (PKS)
|
| Filing 6 Acknowledgment of Receipt of Prisoner Litigation Reform Act and Amendments to MCA 47-5-138 as to #3 Order Opsp2. Acknowledgement filed by Rodney Ready. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(PKS) |
| Filing 5 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Rodney Ready (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(PKS) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: That on or before 9/18/19, plaintiff shall either pay the required filing fee or file a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, specifically the section entitled Certificate to Be Completed by Authorized Officer of prisoner accounts or file an affidavit specifically stating the name of the prison official contacted concerning the Certificate and why this information is not provided to this court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on 8/19/19 (PKS)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The Clerk is directed to mail to prisoner plaintiff a copy of notice of new law (PSP-1); Acknowledgment of Receipt and Certification (PSP-3); and form for voluntary dismissal (PSP-4). Plaintiff is directed to sign either the Acknowledgment (PSP-3) or Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (PSP-4) and return to Clerk within 30 days of the date of this order or case may be dismissed without prejudice. Order with packet of forms mailed. Prisoner Petition Pleadings due by 9/19/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on 8/19/19 (PKS)
|
| Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Rodney Ready (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JCH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kimberly Echols, Falisha McClendon, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Lyndo Ramero, Malika Rush, Jeremy St. Julian, filed by Rodney Ready. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Exhibit A - various documents, #3 Notice of Assignment)(JCH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
