Porter v. Errington
Keith LaDale Porter |
Joe Errington |
Pro Se Department |
1:2019cv00669 |
September 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Louis Guirola |
Michael T Parker |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Certificate of Appealability Denied Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 10/25/2019 (wld) |
Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT: cause dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 10/25/2019 (wld) |
Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: Petition for habeas relief is dismissed without prejudice so that Petitioner Keith LaDale Porter may proceed with his pending habeas petition. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 10/25/2019 (wld) |
Filing 4 ORDER *RESTRICTED* granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 10/21/2019 (wld) |
Filing 3 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Keith LaDale Porter (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(wld) |
Filing 2 ORDER: on or before October 30, 2019, petitioner shall complete and file the attached application OR pay the $5.00 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 9/30/2019 (wld) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Keith LaDale Porter. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment)(wld) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.