Fields v. Hubbard
Brandon Fields |
State of Mississippi H.C.A.D.C. and Evan Hubbard |
Pro Se Department |
1:2019cv00820 |
October 30, 2019 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Louis Guirola |
Robert H Walker |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Evan Hubbard (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (2014 Lauderdale Co. Sentencing Order), #2 Exhibit B (2018 Harrison Co. Sentencing Order, #3 Exhibit C (Order of Continuance re Preliminary Hearing), #4 Exhibit D (Mittimus), #5 Exhibit E (Demand for Speedy Trial), #6 Exhibit F (Motion to Reduce Bond), #7 Exhibit G (Order reducing bond), #8 Exhibit H (Mandamus in Mississippi Supreme Court Cause No. 2019-M-01825))(Rutherford-State Gov, Erin) |
Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE by certified mail, Executed as to Jim Hood for Evan Hubbard served on 12/5/2019, answer due 12/26/2019. (wld) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 5 MOTION to Amend #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Brandon Fields (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(wld) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brandon Fields (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(wld) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Brandon Fields. (Attachments: #1 Miscellaneous Attachments, #2 Envelope, #3 Notice of Assignment)(wld) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.