Williams v. Mississippi Department of Human Services et al
| Kirkland Williams |
| John or Jane Does 1-15 and Mississippi Department of Human Services |
| 1:2019cv00909 |
| November 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| John C Gargiulo |
| Halil S Ozerden |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting as unopposed Plaintiff's Motion #6 for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion #4 to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Response is due on or before January 22, 2020. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE FROM THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on January 3, 2020. (RN)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss by Kirkland Williams (Tynes, Douglas) |
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER staying discovery. Mississippi Department of Human Services has filed a Motion to Dismiss #4 asserting immunity. Filing a motion asserting immunity stays the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery, pending the Courts ruling on the motion. L.U.Civ.P. 16(b)(3)(B). Proceedings are stayed under L.U.Civ.P. 16(b)(3)(B) pending ruling on the Motion to Dismiss. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on 12/27/2019 (HM)
|
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Mississippi Department of Human Services (Peresich, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by Mississippi Department of Human Services (Peresich, Stephen) |
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER finding moot #3 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, filed by Mississippi Department of Human Services. The Court previously granted MDHS an extension of time until 12/20/19 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on 12/2/19 (HM)
|
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Mississippi Department of Human Services (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - 11.26.19 email from Plaintiff's counsel)(Peresich, Stephen) |
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #2 Motion for Extension of Time. Mississippi Department of Human Services is granted an extension of time until December 20, 2019, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on 11/27/19 (HM)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Mississippi Department of Human Services (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - 11.22.19 email to Plaintiff's counsel)(Peresich, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Mississippi Department of Human Services from Circuit Court of Jackson County, Mississippi, case number 19-00,0174-KJ. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0538-4147506) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Complaint, #2 Exhibit B-Summons issued to MDHS, #3 Exhibit C-Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit D-State Court File, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(wld) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
