Havard v. George County Correctional Facility
Casey Thomas Havard |
George County Correctional Facility |
Pro Se Department |
1:2020cv00137 |
April 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
John C Gargiulo |
Halil S Ozerden |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Letter from Casey Havard (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (wld) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Amend Request for Jury Trial by Casey Thomas Havard (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (RLW) |
Filing 5 Response to Order re #4 ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION filed by Casey Thomas Havard (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(wld) |
Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Petitioner shall file a written signed response on or before May 19, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on 4/14/2020 (wld) |
Filing 3 ORDER *RESTRICTED* granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on 4/14/2020 (wld) |
Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Casey Thomas Havard (Attachments: #1Rules Governing Section 2254 and 2255 Cases)(wld) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Casey Thomas Havard. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(wld) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/9/2020: #2 Notice of Assignment) (wld). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.