Hoffman v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc.
| Johnnie Lamar Hoffman |
| Huntington Ingalls, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00143 |
| April 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Louis Guirola |
| Robert H Walker |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Default Judgment by Johnnie Lamar Hoffman (JCH) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Johnnie Lamar Hoffman. (JCH) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Huntington Ingalls, Inc. re #5 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #4 MOTION to Dismiss (Gates, Adam) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (Gates, Adam) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (Gates, Adam) |
| Filing 3 RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Johnnie Lamar Hoffman. (JCH) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #2 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. answer due 5/14/2020. No further written order will issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on April 21, 2020 (King, Steve)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (Gates, Adam) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Huntington Ingalls, Inc. from Jackson County Circuit Court, case number 20-00,040-DH. Lower court jury demand. (Filing fee $ 400; receipt number 0538-4254100) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #2 Exhibit B - MS Secretary of State Filings, #3 Exhibit C - Notice of Filing Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Notice of Assignment mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff)(JCH) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 1. Attorney is advised that the Defendant was named as Huntington Ingalls, Inc. in the lower court complaint and should be named exactly like that in all future filed pleadings. If the party was listed incorrectly, a Motion to Change Name should be filed with the court. (JCH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hoffman v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Johnnie Lamar Hoffman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Huntington Ingalls, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Adam H. Gates |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
