United States of America v. $21,480.00 United States Currency et al
| United States of America |
| Ten Rounds of .45 Caliber Aummunition, One Samsung Galaxy J7 Mobile Telephone, One Glock .45 Caliber, 30 Semi-Auto Pistol, Two LG Mobile Telephones, One Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Mobile Telephone, One Glock .45 Caliber Magazine, $21,480.00 United States Currency and One Apple iPhone |
| 1:2020cv00293 |
| September 11, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| John C Gargiulo |
| Halil S Ozerden |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. § 881 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Warrant Issued as to All Defendants. (ASJ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Complaint for Forfeiture by United States of America re #1 Complaint, (Cole-Federal Gov, Shundral) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM by United States of America (Cole-Federal Gov, Shundral) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against $21,480.00 United States Currency, One Apple iPhone, One Glock.45 Caliber Magazine, One Glock.45 Caliber, 30 Semi-Auto Pistol, One Samsung Galaxy J7 Mobile Telephone, One Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Mobile Telephone, Ten Rounds of.45 Caliber Aummunition, Two LG Mobile Telephones, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(JCH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
