Toomer v. Nelson et al
| Jesse Carl Toomer |
| Aramark Food Services, Mike Ezell, Tyrone Nelson and Jackson County ADC/Jail |
| Pro Se Department |
| 1:2020cv00374 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Louis Guirola |
| Robert P Myers |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND: Plaintiff Jesse Carl Toomer shall file aresponse consistent with this Order no later than 2/26/21. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr. on 2/12/21. (RLW)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER *RESTRICTED* granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and setting payment schedule as set forth in order; *RESTRICTED* granting #10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and setting payment schedule as set forth in order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr. on 20cv374. (RLW)
|
|
Filing 10
*RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jesse Carl Toomer (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (RLW)
|
|
Filing 9
Acknowledgment of Receipt of Prisoner Litigation Reform Act and Amendments to MCA 47-5-138 as to #3 Order Opsp2. Acknowledgement filed by Jesse Carl Toomer (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (RLW)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Clerk shall mail another copy of both Orders [3, 4], entered 12/28/020, to pro se Plaintiff Jesse Carl Toomer at his new address of record. Plaintiff shall have until 2/26/21, to comply with those Orders. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr. on 1/27/21. (RLW)
|
|
Filing 7
Change of Address filed by Jesse Carl Toomer (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(wld)
|
|
Filing 6
Mail Returned as Undeliverable as to #3 Order Opsp2, #4 Order Opsp8. Mail sent to Jesse Carl Toomer. (RLW)
|
|
Filing 5
Mail Returned Undeliverable. NEFS re #1 Complaint, #2 Motion and copy of Notice of Assignment. Mail sent to Jesse Carl Toomer. (RLW)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: On or before 1/27/2021, plaintiff shall either pay the required filing fee or file a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, specifically the section entitled Certificate to Be Completed by Authorized Officer of prisoner accounts or file an affidavit specifically stating the name of the prison official contacted concerning the Certificate and why this information is not provided to this court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr. on 12/28/20. (RLW)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The Clerk is directed to mail to prisoner plaintiff a copy of notice of new law (PSP-1); Acknowledgment of Receipt and Certification (PSP-3); and form for voluntary dismissal (PSP-4). Plaintiff is directed to sign either the Acknowledgment (PSP-3) or Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (PSP-4) and return to Clerk within 30 days of the date of this order or case may be dismissed without prejudice. Order with packet of forms mailed. Prisoner Petition Pleadings due by 1/28/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr. on 12/28/20. (RLW)
|
|
Filing 2
*RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, by Jesse Carl Toomer (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (RLW)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT, with jury demand, against Aramark Food Services, Mike Ezell, Jackson County ADC/Jail, Tyrone Nelson, filed by Jesse Carl Toomer (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment) (RLW)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
