Hansen v. Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company et al
| Joshua Hansen |
| Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company and Frederick Franklin |
| 1:2021cv00067 |
| March 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| John C Gargiulo |
| Halil S Ozerden |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald Giles Peresich, Jr on behalf of Frederick Franklin (Peresich, Ronald) |
| Reset Hearing: Due to a conflict with Defense Counsel's schedule, the Telephonic Case Management Conference is RESET for 5/26/2021 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo. Counsel will follow all other instructions given in the Rule 16(a) Initial Order #12 . (AB) |
| Filing 12 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 5/17/2021 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo. (AB) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION of Liability Only for Causing Accident by Frederick Franklin (Peresich, Stephen) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #4 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal), Crossclaim by Frederick Franklin.(Peresich, Stephen) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Frederick Franklin (Peresich, Stephen) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company (Still, Jonathan) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #7 Unopposed Motion for Time. Defendant Frederick Franklin is granted an extension of time, until April 12, 2021, to respond to the crossclaim. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on 3/30/21 (HM)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal), Crossclaim by Frederick Franklin (Peresich, Stephen) |
| Filing 6 State Court Record by Defendant Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company (Still, Jonathan) |
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Frederick Franklin's deadline for responding to the Complaint is April 12, 2021. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on 3/23/21 (HM)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Frederick Franklin (Peresich, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) , CROSSCLAIM against Frederick Franklin by Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company (Still, Jonathan) |
| Filing 3 Joinder in Document by Frederick Franklin to #1 Notice of Removal,,, filed by Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company (Peresich, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Z. Claxton on behalf of Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company (Claxton, Benjamin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company from Circuit Court of Harrison County, Mississippi, case number A2402-21-31. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0538-4502960) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Complaint, #2 Exhibit B-Documents Served on Defendant, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(wld) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
