Sloan v. Memorial Hospital at Gulfport
Jeff Sloan |
Gulfport Memorial Hospital and Memorial Hospital at Gulfport |
1:2021cv00086 |
March 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Louis Guirola |
Michael T Parker |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Rebuttal re #2 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Memorial Hospital at Gulfport (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "1" EEOC Activity Log, #2 Exhibit "2" - EEOC Charge Detail Inquiry)(Powers, Matthew) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #11 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Reply due 4/29/2021. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE FROM THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 4/20/2021 (cf) |
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #2 MOTION to Dismiss by Memorial Hospital at Gulfport (Powers, Matthew) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Memorial Hospital at Gulfport (Powers, Matthew) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Stay Proceedings; granting #7 Motion to Substitute Party. Clerk is directed to substitute Memorial Hospital at Gulfport for Gulfport Memorial Hospital on the docket. References in prior pleadings to Gulfport Memorial Hospital will be deemed references to Memorial Hospital at Gulfport. See Order for more details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 4/16/21. (RLW) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jeff Sloan (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - EEOC Questionnaire, #2 Exhibit B - EEOC Charge, #3 Exhibit C - EEOC email, #4 Exhibit D - Right to Sue)(Waide, Daniel) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Substitute Party by Jeff Sloan (Waide, Daniel) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Response due 04/16/2021. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE FROM THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 04/08/2021 (cf) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #2 MOTION to Dismiss by Jeff Sloan (Waide, Daniel) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #4 MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by Gulfport Memorial Hospital (Powers, Matthew) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Gulfport Memorial Hospital (Powers, Matthew) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #2 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Gulfport Memorial Hospital (Powers, Matthew) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss by Gulfport Memorial Hospital (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "1" - Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit "2" - Charge of Discrimination, #3 Exhibit "3" - EEOC Dismissal and Notice of Rights, #4 Exhibit "4" - Email dated 07/20/2020)(Powers, Matthew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Gulfport Memorial Hospital from Circuit Court of Stone County, MS, case number 66CI1:21cv30, jury demand in lower court. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number 0538-4513964) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (RLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.