Diversified Computer Systems, Inc. v. Pearl River County, Mississippi et al
| Diversified Computer Systems, Inc. |
| Pearl River County, Mississippi, John and Jane Does A; B; C; D; and E and Corporations X, Y, and Z |
| 1:2021cv00266 |
| August 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| John C Gargiulo |
| Halil S Ozerden |
| Robert H Walker |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 10/1/21 (MGB)
|
| Parties should include the newly assigned Magistrate Judge's initials RHWR on future filings. (MGB) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Pearl River County, Mississippi. (RLW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, with jury demand, against Corporations X, Y, and Z, John and Jane Does A; B; C; D; and E, Pearl River County, Mississippi (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number 14643013539), filed by Diversified Computer Systems, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Notice Letter and Certified Mail Receipt, #2 Exhibit 2 - Standard Software License and Services Agreement, #3 Exhibit 3 - Invoice, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (RLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
