Ngo v. Hotel Charlie, LLC et al
| Kimngoc Ngo |
| Hotel Charlie, LLC, Hong Van Nguyen and Men Thi Ly |
| 1:2021cv00342 |
| November 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Halil S Ozerden |
| Robert H Walker |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Hotel Charlie, LLC answer due 2/4/2022; Men Thi Ly answer due 2/4/2022; and Hong Van Nguyen answer due 2/4/2022. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE FROM THE COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker on 12/22/2021 (AB)
|
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Hotel Charlie, LLC, Men Thi Ly, Hong Van Nguyen (Wells, Randall) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Hotel Charlie, LLC, Men Thi Ly, Hong Van Nguyen. (RLW) |
| Remark: The original issued summonses for return and service were emailed to attorney. (RLW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, with jury demand, against Hotel Charlie, LLC, Men Thi Ly, Hong Van Nguyen (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number 4697542), filed by Kimngoc Ngo (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (RLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
