Cincinnati Global Dedicated No. 2 Limited v. 1909 E. Pass Rd., LLC
Cincinnati Global Dedicated No. 2 Limited |
1909 E. Pass Rd., LLC |
1:2022cv00041 |
February 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Halil S Ozerden |
Robert H Walker |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Rebuttal re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(7) filed by 1909 E. Pass Rd., LLC (Welsh, C.) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(7) filed by Cincinnati Global Dedicated No. 2 Limited (Johnson, Whitman) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(7) filed by Cincinnati Global Dedicated No. 2 Limited (Johnson, Whitman) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting as unopposed Plaintiff's #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's #4 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's #4 Motion is now due on or before April 18, 2022. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE FROM THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on April 7, 2022. (ENW) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. That Attorney Christopher J. Shannon be admitted pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Plaintiff Cincinnati Global Dedicated No. 2 Limited in association with local counsel conditioned upon completion of the registration procedures found on the Court's website and at the following link: https://www.mssd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions-page. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE FROM THE COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker on 4/7/2022 (AB) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Christopher J. Shannon to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number AMSSDC-4807501) by Cincinnati Global Dedicated No. 2 Limited (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Illinois)(Johnson, Whitman) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(7) by Cincinnati Global Dedicated No. 2 Limited (Johnson, Whitman) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER staying proceedings. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #4 challenges personal jurisdiction. Pursuant to Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(3)(B), the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery are stayed, pending the Court's ruling on the jurisdictional Motion #4 . NO FURTHER ORDER WILL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker on 3/28/22 (HM) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(7) filed by 1909 E. Pass Rd., LLC (Welsh, C.) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(7) by 1909 E. Pass Rd., LLC (Welsh, C.) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Ann Russell Chandler on behalf of 1909 E. Pass Rd., LLC (Chandler, Ann) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by C. Victor Welsh, III on behalf of 1909 E. Pass Rd., LLC (Welsh, C.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 1909 E. Pass Rd., LLC (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number 4777721), filed by Cincinnati Global Dedicated No. 2 Limited (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Policy, #2 Exhibit 2 - September 1, 2021 Letter to Insured, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (RLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.