Loper v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Matthew D. Loper |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA General Counsel |
| 1:2022cv00082 |
| April 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Taylor B McNeel |
| Robert P Myers |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed in Social Security Case by Matthew D. Loper. Service made upon: U S Attorney; (Thomas, Ashley) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed in Social Security Case by Matthew D. Loper. Service made upon: (Thomas, Ashley) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed in Social Security Case by Matthew D. Loper. Commissioner of Social Security served on 4/26/2022, answer due 7/25/2022. Service made upon: U S Attorney General; (Thomas, Ashley) |
Filing 3
ORDER establishing briefing schedule and setting forth briefing requirements. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr. on April 14, 2022. (JC)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (RLW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number 4808764), filed by Matthew D. Loper (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (RLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
