United States of America v. $40,000.00 United States Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $40,000.00 United States Currency
Claimant: Nathan Lavel Duckworth
Case Number: 1:2022cv00099
Filed: April 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Louis Guirola
Referring Judge: Robert P Myers
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2022 Opinion or Order DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #7: Nathan Lavel Duckworth is represented by counsel, therefore, the Answer to Complaint should have been signed by counsel. This entry is disregarded and counsel for Mr. Duckworth is advised to sign the Answer in both places and re-file. (RLW)
June 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 **ERROR**Disregard this entry. ANSWER to #1 Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem by Nathan Lavel Duckworth. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #6 Verified Claim) (Davis, James) Modified on 6/15/2022 to remove relationship to document #1 (RLW).
May 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CLAIM by Nathan Lavel Duckworth (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(wld)
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint. Nathan Lavel Duckworth shall have until 6/6/2022 to file a response to the verified complaint. No further written order will issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr on May 26, 2022 (SK)
May 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by $40,000.00 United States Currency (Davis, James)
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Warrant of Arrest In Rem Issued as to $40,000.00 United States Currency. (RLW)
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 APPLICATION WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM as to Defendant Property by United States of America (Baldwin-Federal Gov, Clay)
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Complaint for Forfeiture by United States of America re #1 Complaint (Baldwin-Federal Gov, Clay)
April 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT against $40,000.00 United States Currency, filed by United States of America (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration in Support of Verified Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (RLW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. $40,000.00 United States Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Clay B. Baldwin-Federal Gov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $40,000.00 United States Currency
Represented By: James L. Davis, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Nathan Lavel Duckworth
Represented By: James L. Davis, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?