United States of America v. One (1) Springfield Armory Pistol et al
| United States of America |
| One (1) Springfield Armory Pistol, Seven (7) Rounds Assorted .40 Caliber Ammunition and Two (2) 19-Round Capable 9MM Ammunition Magazines |
| 1:2022cv00126 |
| May 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Taylor B McNeel |
| Robert P Myers |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Warrant of Arrest in Rem Issued as to One (1) Springfield Armory Pistol, Seven (7) Rounds Assorted.40 Caliber Ammunition, Two (2) 19-Round Capable 9MM Ammunition Magazines. (RLW) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM as to Defendant Property by United States of America (Baldwin-Federal Gov, Clay) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Complaint for Forfeiture by United States of America re #1 Complaint, (Baldwin-Federal Gov, Clay) |
| Remark: Copies of #4 Warrant was emailed to USAO (RLW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against One (1) Springfield Armory Pistol, Seven (7) Rounds Assorted.40 Caliber Ammunition, Two (2) 19-Round Capable 9MM Ammunition Magazines, filed by United States of America (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration in Support of Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (RLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
