Pitts v. Hood Industries, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Brandie C. Pitts
Defendant: Hood Industries, Inc. and Christopher Bond
Case Number: 1:2022cv00146
Filed: June 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Halil S Ozerden
Referring Judge: Bradley W Rath
2 Judge: Robert H Walker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 8/1/2022 (LAT) (Main Document 11 replaced on 8/1/2022) (LAT). (Main Document 11 replaced on 8/2/2022) (LAT).
August 1, 2022 Reset Hearing: Due to reassignment, the EARLY Settlement Conference is reset for 8/11/2022 at 1:30 PM in Chambers 672 (Gulfport) before Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath. Counsel are instructed to submit to Judge Rath, seven (7) days prior to the conference, a memorandum (3 page maximum in PDF format) setting forth a brief explanation of the case, and a candid appraisal of their respective positions, including possible settlement figures. This document is NOT to be exchanged and will be viewed only by the Court. The settlement memoranda should be sent to Judge Rath via e-mail (rath_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov). LOCAL COUNSEL, LEAD COUNSEL AND PARTIES WITH FULL SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY MUST BE PHYSICALLY PRESENT AT THE CONFERENCE (INCLUDING INSURANCE CARRIERS WHO HAVE AUTHORITY). FAILURE TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS. (AB)
August 1, 2022 Remark: Parties should include the newly assigned Magistrate Judges initials BWR on future filings. (LAT)
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Jury Trial set for a three week trial calendar beginning on 8/7/2023 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 806 (Gulfport) before District Judge Halil S. Ozerden. Pretrial Conference set for 7/18-20/2023 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 806 (Gulfport) before District Judge Halil S. Ozerden. Discovery due by 2/3/2023. Motions for Amended Pleadings due by 8/19/2022. Motions for Joinder of Parties due by 8/19/2022. Designate Experts Plaintiff Deadline due by 10/5/2022. Designate Experts for Defendant Deadline due by 11/4/2022. Motions due by 2/17/2023. EARLY Settlement Conference set for 8/11/2022 at 1:30 PM in Chambers 672 (Gulfport) before Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker. ADR Report due by 7/11/2023. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 7/18/2023. EDT: 3 days. Parties do not consent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker on 7/20/2022 (AB) Modified on 7/20/2022 to correct typo (AB).
July 20, 2022 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker: Telephonic Case Management Conference held on 7/20/2022. PARTICIPANTS: Anna K. Rush (counsel for Plaintiff); Martin J. Regimbal, Gillian Griffin - PHV, Stephen Mark Klyza - PHV (counsel for Defendants). A Case Management Order will be entered. (AB)
July 19, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Service of Pre-Discovery Disclosure by Christopher Bond, Hood Industries, Inc. (Klyza - PHV, Stephen)
July 19, 2022 DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 7. Attorney is advised that this document was filed incorrectly. The document should be re-filed as a Notice of Service of Disclosure, which can be found under the "Discovery Documents" category. This document will be disregarded on the docket. (JCH)
July 18, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Service of Initial Disclosure by Brandie C. Pitts (Rush, Anna)
July 18, 2022 Filing 7 **DISREGARD**NOTICE Of Service of Pre-Discovery Disclosure Information by Christopher Bond, Hood Industries, Inc. (Klyza - PHV, Stephen) Modified on 7/19/2022 (JCH).
July 18, 2022 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Christopher Bond, Hood Industries, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Hood Companies Inc. for Christopher Bond, Hood Industries, Inc.. (Klyza - PHV, Stephen)
June 17, 2022 Filing 5 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 7/20/2022 at 9:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker. (AB)
June 17, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. That Attorneys S. Mark Klyza and Gillian Griffin be admitted pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Defendants Hood Industries, Inc. and Christopher Bond in association with local counsel conditioned upon completion of the registration procedures found on the Court's website and at the following link: https://www.mssd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions-page. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE FROM THE COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker on 6/17/2022 (AB)
June 16, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Gillian Griffin to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number AMSSDC-4862071) by Christopher Bond, Hood Industries, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Regimbal, Martin)
June 16, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for S. Mark Klyza to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number AMSSDC-4862061) by Christopher Bond, Hood Industries, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Regimbal, Martin)
June 16, 2022 Filing 2 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Christopher Bond, Hood Industries, Inc. (Regimbal, Martin)
June 16, 2022 DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 2. Attorney is advised that all future filings should reflect "Southern Division", not "Gulfport Division". (JCH)
June 10, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Christopher Bond, Hood Industries, Inc. from Circuit Court of Stone County Mississippi, case number 66CI1:22cv39. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 4857543) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2-State Court Documents filed including served documents, #3 Exhibit 3-Notice to State Court, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(wld)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pitts v. Hood Industries, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandie C. Pitts
Represented By: Anna K. Rush
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hood Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Martin J. Regimbal
Represented By: Gillian Griffin - PHV
Represented By: Stephen Mark Klyza - PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Bond
Represented By: Martin J. Regimbal
Represented By: Gillian Griffin - PHV
Represented By: Stephen Mark Klyza - PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?