Hale v. Galindo et al
| Ashley Denise Hale |
| Ancelmo Inez Galindo, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company doing business as Great Lakes Dredging, LLC and John Does #1-10 |
| 1:2022cv00183 |
| July 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Halil S Ozerden |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Robert H Walker |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF Receipt by Circuit Clerk of Harrison County, received on 8/29/22. (JCH)
|
|
Filing 8
Letter to Connie Ladner, Harrison County Circuit Clerk, transmitting certified copies of Order to Remand and docket sheet. (JCH)
|
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT: Ordered that this case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Harrison County, Second Judicial District. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 8/25/22. (JCH)
|
|
Reset Hearing: Due to reassignment, the Telephonic Case Management Conference is reset for 9/27/2022 at 1:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath. Counsel for Plaintiff will place the call to Judge Rath's Chambers (228-563-1755) with all necessary counsel on the line. Seven (7) days prior to the conference, counsel shall submit a Confidential Memorandum (pdf format) (3 page maximum) and a proposed Case Management Order to rath_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov. The CONFIDENTIAL case memoranda are NOT to be exchanged and will be viewed only by the Court. (AB)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 8/1/22 (LAT) (Main Document 6 replaced on 8/2/2022) (LAT).
|
|
Remark: Parties should include the newly assigned Magistrate Judge's Initials BWR on future filings. (LAT)
|
|
Filing 5
State Court Record by Defendants Ancelmo Inez Galindo, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company Volumes 1 (Williams, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Service of Response to Request for Admissions by Ancelmo Inez Galindo, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company (Williams, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 3
Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 9/27/2022 at 1:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker. (AB)
|
|
Filing 2
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Ancelmo Inez Galindo, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company.(Williams, Matthew)
|
|
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #2. Incorrect event code selected. Counsel should have selected "Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal)" which can be found under "Other Answers". Counsel does not need to refile. (wld)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ancelmo Inez Galindo, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company from Circuit Court of Harrison County, Mississippi, case number A24022200119. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 4884031) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2-Counsel List, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(wld)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
