Jesus v. Gray Media Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Father Jesus
Defendant: Grey Television Inc, Gray Media Group, Inc. and Raycom Media, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00204
Filed: August 5, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Halil S Ozerden
Referring Judge: Bradley W Rath
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2022 Filing 40 MEMORANDUM in Support re #39 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Gray Media Group, Inc. (Richmond, Ryan)
September 30, 2022 Filing 39 MOTION to Dismiss by Gray Media Group, Inc. (Richmond, Ryan)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER denying Plaintiff's Motion #20 for Sanctions. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on September 22, 2022. (sa)
September 22, 2022 Filing 37 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Gray Media Group, Inc., filed by Father Jesus (RLW)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER denying as moot #30 Motion to Fix Clerical Mistakes on Current Complaint; granting #33 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying without prejudice, with leave to reassert #11 Motion to Dismiss. Clerk is directed to file the proposed Amended Complaint attached to Plaintiff's #33 Motion as Exhibit A, as the Second Amended Complaint in this case. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 9/22/22. (RLW)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER granting Defendant's Motion #15 to Take Judicial Notice. The Federal Rules of Evidence allow the Court to "judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it: (1) is generally known within the trial court's territorial jurisdiction; or (2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned." Fed. R. Evid. 201. The Court will take judicial notice of the identified documents pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE FROM THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on September 22, 2022. (sa)
September 9, 2022 Filing 35 RESPONSE in Opposition re #33 MOTION to Amend/Correct #4 Amended Complaint filed by Gray Media Group, Inc. (Richmond, Ryan)
September 2, 2022 Filing 34 MEMORANDUM in Support re #33 MOTION to Amend/Correct #4 Amended Complaint filed by Father Jesus (RLW)
September 2, 2022 Filing 33 MOTION to Amend/Correct #4 Amended Complaint by Father Jesus (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Amended Complaint) (RLW)
September 1, 2022 Filing 32 REPLY to Response to Motion re #30 MOTION to Fix Clerical Mistakes on Current Complaint, #31 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Father Jesus (RLW)
September 1, 2022 Filing 31 RESPONSE in Opposition re #30 MOTION to Fix Clerical Mistakes on Current Complaint filed by Gray Media Group, Inc. (Richmond, Ryan)
August 25, 2022 Filing 30 MOTION to Fix Clerical Mistakes on Current Complaint, by Father Jesus (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Amended Complaint) (RLW)
August 24, 2022 Filing 29 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION for Default Judgment as to MOTION to Request Defendant Not Threaten Plaintiff MOTION to Produce filed by Gray Media Group, Inc. (Richmond, Ryan)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER staying attorney conference, disclosure requirements, and all discovery. Defendant has filed a Motion #11 that challenges jurisdiction. The attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery are stayed as provided in Local Rule 16(b)(1)(B), pending ruling on the jurisdictional Motion. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE FROM THIS COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 8/24/22 (TS)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER denying #26 Motion to Amend/Correct Amended Complaint. Local Rule 7(b)(2) provides that [i]f leave of court is required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15, a proposed amended pleading must be an exhibit to a motion for leave to file the pleading... L. U. Civ. R. 7(b)(2). Plaintiff did not attach a proposed amended pleading. Therefore, the #26 Motion is denied. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE FROM THIS COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 8/23/22 (TS)
August 22, 2022 Filing 28 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION Request for Injunction filed by Father Jesus (JCH)
August 22, 2022 Filing 27 AMENDED RESPONSE to Motion re #11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Father Jesus (JCH)
August 22, 2022 Filing 26 MOTION to Amend/Correct #4 Amended Complaint by Father Jesus. (JCH)
August 22, 2022 Filing 25 RESPONSE in Opposition re #20 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Gray Media Group, Inc. (Richmond, Ryan)
August 22, 2022 DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 26. This document refers to an exhibit A. There is no exhibit A attached to this document. (JCH)
August 19, 2022 Filing 24 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION Request for Injunction filed by Gray Media Group, Inc. (Richmond, Ryan)
August 19, 2022 DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 23. L.U.Civ.R. Rule 11.(a) states that all filed, signed documents must contain counsel's name, address, telephone number, fax number, e-mail address and counsel's bar membership identification number. Attorney is advised to comply with this requirement in future filings. (JCH)
August 17, 2022 Filing 23 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Gray Media Group, Inc. re #22 Order (Richmond, Ryan)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER striking Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint #21 . Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 8/16/2022 (BTC)
August 15, 2022 Filing 21 **STRICKEN PER ORDER #22 **Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against Gray Media Group, Inc., filed by Father Jesus.(JCH) Modified on 8/16/2022 (JCH).
August 15, 2022 Filing 20 MOTION for Sanctions by Father Jesus (JCH)
August 15, 2022 Filing 19 Response in Opposition re #15 MOTION to Take Judicial Notice by Gray Media Group, Inc., Grey Television Inc (Richmond, Ryan) filed by Father Jesus (JCH)
August 15, 2022 Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion re #13 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Father Jesus (JCH)
August 15, 2022 Filing 17 RESPONSE to Motion re #11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Father Jesus (JCH)
August 12, 2022 Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Support re #15 MOTION to Take Judicial Notice filed by Gray Media Group, Inc.(Richmond, Ryan) Modified to remove terminated filer on 8/19/2022 (JCH).
August 12, 2022 Filing 15 MOTION to Take Judicial Notice by Gray Media Group, Inc. (Richmond, Ryan) Modified to remove terminated filer on 8/19/2022 (JCH).
August 12, 2022 Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Support re #13 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Gray Media Group, Inc. (Richmond, Ryan) Modified to remove terminated filer on 8/19/2022 (JCH).
August 12, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION for Protective Order by Gray Media Group, Inc. (Richmond, Ryan) Modified to remove terminated filer on 8/19/2022 (JCH).
August 12, 2022 Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support re #11 MOTION to Dismiss WITH PREJUDICE filed by Gray Media Group, Inc. (Richmond, Ryan) Modified to remove terminated filer on 8/19/2022 (JCH).
August 12, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss WITH PREJUDICE by Gray Media Group, Inc. (Richmond, Ryan) Modified to remove terminated filer on 8/19/2022 (JCH).
August 12, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION for Default Judgment, MOTION to Request Defendant Not Threaten Plaintiff, MOTION to Produce the Admissions Ordered by the Court, by Father Jesus (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Emails) (RLW)
August 12, 2022 DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 11 - # 16. 1.) Attorney is advised that the complete case number is 1:22cv204 HSO-BWR, which should be used on all future filings. 2.) Grey Television, Inc. was selected as a filer to these documents. This party was terminated with the filing of the Amended Complaint on 8/8/22. The correct defendant is Gray Media Group, Inc. and should be listed as such in the style of the case and above the signature line and the terminated party should no longer be selected as a filer. Clerk's Office has removed Grey Television, Inc. as a filer to these documents. DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 14. The Memorandum and exhibits are filed as one main document. Exhibits should be scanned separately and docketed as properly identified attachments to the main document within the same docket entry. Attorney is directed to follow this procedure in future filings. L.U.Civ.R. 7.(b)(2). (JCH)
August 8, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Service of Request for Admissions by Father Jesus (RLW)
August 8, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Service of Request for Production by Father Jesus (RLW)
August 8, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Service of Interrogatories by Father Jesus (RLW)
August 8, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Gray Media Group, Inc. (RLW)
August 8, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION Request for Injunction by Father Jesus (RLW)
August 8, 2022 Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Gray Media Group, Inc., filed by Father Jesus (RLW)
August 5, 2022 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Grey Television Inc identifying Corporate Parent Gray Television, Inc. for Grey Television Inc. (Richmond, Ryan)
August 5, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Assignment (RLW)
August 5, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Grey Television Inc from Circuit Court of Harrison Co., MS, 1st Jud. Dist., case number A2401-22-213, with jury demand lower court. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number 4903225) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A1 and A2 - State Court Record, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (RLW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jesus v. Gray Media Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Father Jesus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Grey Television Inc
Represented By: Ryan J. Richmond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gray Media Group, Inc.
Represented By: Ryan J. Richmond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raycom Media, Inc.
Represented By: Ryan J. Richmond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?