Jesus v. Lamar Company
| Father Jesus |
| Lamar Advertising Company and Lamar Company |
| 1:2022cv00209 |
| August 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Halil S Ozerden |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
RESPONSE to Motion re #18 MOTION for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 or the Mississippi Litigation Accountability Act filed by Father Jesus (wld)
|
|
Filing 19
MEMORANDUM in Support re #18 MOTION for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 or the Mississippi Litigation Accountability Act filed by Lamar Company (Reppeto, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 18
MOTION for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 or the Mississippi Litigation Accountability Act by Lamar Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Email Exchange dated August 2, 2022, #2 Exhibit B - Email dated August 5, 2021, #3 Exhibit C - Email dated August 22, 2022, #4 Exhibit D - Affidavit of Lisa A. Reppeto)(Reppeto, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 17
RESPONSE to Motion re #14 MOTION to Amend/Correct Defendant's Name filed by Lamar Company (Reppeto, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 16
RESPONSE to Motion re #12 MOTION to Amend/Correct #3 Amended Complaint filed by Lamar Company (Reppeto, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 15
MEMORANDUM in Support re #14 MOTION to Amend/Correct Defendant's Name filed by Father Jesus (RLW)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION to Amend/Correct Defendant's Name by Father Jesus (RLW)
|
|
Filing 13
MEMORANDUM in Support re #12 MOTION to Amend/Correct #3 Second Amended Complaint filed by Father Jesus (Attachments: #1 Proposed 2nd Amended Complaint) (RLW)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION to Amend/Correct #3 Second Amended Complaint by Father Jesus (Attachments: #1 Proposed 2nd Amended Complaint) (RLW)
|
|
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION re #7 MOTION for Correction of Clerical Mistakes filed by Lamar Company (Reppeto, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Strike #8 Response to Motion to Quash Summons, Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment by Lamar Company (Reppeto, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 9
RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION for Correction of Clerical Mistakes filed by Lamar Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - August 2, 2022 Email Exchange) (Reppeto, Lisa) Modified on 8/26/2022 to delete incorrect verbiage (RLW).
|
|
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #9: Any memorandum must be an item created and docketed separately from a response. Attorney is advised to file the same pdf document as a Memorandum in Opposition to Motion and link to the appropriate document. The event code is under Responses and Replies. (RLW)
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION to Quash Summons or, in the Alternative, MOTION to Dismiss, MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Father Jesus (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Amended Complaint) (wld) Modified on 9/16/2022 (RLW).
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Correction of Clerical Mistakes on Amended Complaint and Request for Injunction to Equally Purchase Advertising Space filed 8/8/2022 in State Court by Father Jesus (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Amended Complaint)(wld)
|
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER staying attorney conference, disclosure requirements, and all discovery. Defendant has filed a Motion #4 that challenges jurisdiction. The attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery are stayed as provided in Local Rule 16(b)(1)(B), pending ruling on the jurisdictional Motion. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 8/23/2022 (HM)
|
|
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #4, #5, and #6: Plaintiff's Amended Complaint was filed on 8/15/22 which terminated Lamar Advertising Company as the defendant and added The Lamar Company as the defendant. Advising attorney that the defendant's name should be listed in all future filed pleadings as it appears on the docket in the case style, body of the pleading, and above the signature line. If the pending defendant's name is incorrect, attorney may want to consider filing a Motion to Amend/Correct Name. Terminated defendant, Lamar Advertising Company should not be selected as a filer. DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #4: This document requests several motion reliefs. Every motion relief should be selected from the list of motion titles. It is not necessary to refile as court staff has made the necessary correction. Attorney is advised to follow this procedure in future filings. (RLW)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Strike #3 Amended Complaint by Lamar Company (Reppeto, Lisa) Modified on 8/23/2022 to correct filer (RLW).
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION to Quash Summons, and MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Lamar Company (Reppeto, Lisa) Modified on 8/23/2022 to correct filer (RLW).
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Quash Summons and MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, MOTION for Summary Judgment by Lamar Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Scott Gregory) (Reppeto, Lisa). Added MOTION to Dismiss, MOTION for Summary Judgment on 8/23/2022 (RLW). Modified on 8/23/2022 to correct filer (RLW).
|
|
Filing 3
Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against Lamar Company, filed by Father Jesus.(JCH)
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lamar Advertising Company identifying Corporate Parent The Lamar Company, LLC, Corporate Parent Lamar Media Corp. for Lamar Advertising Company. (Reppeto, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Lamar Advertising Company from Circuit Court of Harrison County, Mississippi, case number 24CI1:22cv237. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 4909363) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(wld)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
