Landmark Engineering Group, Inc. v. Elliott Land Developments, LLC
Landmark Engineering Group, Inc. |
Elliott Land Developments, LLC |
1:2023cv00038 |
February 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Louis Guirola |
Bradley W Rath |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) by Landmark Engineering Group, Inc. (Purvis, Jason) |
Filing 9 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 5/18/2023 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath. (AB) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #7: Document was filed with the incorrect defendant's name in the title. This entry will be disregarded. See #8 for correct entry. (RLW) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Elliott Land Developments, LLC (Schwartz, Robert) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Elliott Land Developments, LLC (Schwartz, Robert) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Elliott Land Developments, LLC (Schwartz, Robert) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) by Elliott Land Developments, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Response from Mississippi Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Surveyors, #2 Exhibit B-Record from case 21-104, #3 Exhibit C-Record from case 21-435)(Schwartz, Robert) |
![]() |
Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Reserving all Objections by Elliott Land Developments, LLC (Schwartz, Robert) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Landmark Engineering Group, Inc.. Elliott Land Developments, LLC served on 2/15/2023, answer due 3/8/2023. (Purvis, Jason) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 3. Attorney is advised that the original summons issued by the court and stamped "return" should have been the summons return executed that was filed, not a copy of the summons issued as document #2 . Attorney should follow this procedure in the future. (JCH) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Elliott Land Developments, LLC. (PKS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Elliott Land Developments, LLC (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number 842) filed by Landmark Engineering Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Invoices, #2 Exhibit B - Invoices, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(PKS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Landmark Engineering Group, Inc. v. Elliott Land Developments, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Landmark Engineering Group, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Jason B. Purvis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Elliott Land Developments, LLC | |
Represented By: | Robert Thomas Schwartz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.