United States of America v. One (1) Glock 26, 9MM Caliber Pistol et al
| United States of America |
| One (1) Glock 26, 9MM Caliber Pistol, One (1) Glock 23, 40 Caliber Pistol, One (1) Smith & Wesson SD40VE, 40 Caliber Pistol, One (1) Springfield Armory Model XD9 Pistol and One (1) Taurus PT 740, 40 Caliber Pistol |
| 1:2023cv00056 |
| February 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Halil S Ozerden |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WARRANT of Arrest in Rem Returned Executed as to 3/6/23. (RLW) |
| Filing 4 Warrant of Arrest in Rem Issued (RLW) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM by United States of America (Baldwin-Federal Gov, Clay) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Complaint for Forfeiture by United States of America re #1 Complaint, (Baldwin-Federal Gov, Clay) |
| Remark: Original issued Warrant of Arrest In Rem emailed to attorney (RLW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against One (1) Glock 23, 40 Caliber Pistol, One (1) Glock 26, 9MM Caliber Pistol, One (1) Smith & Wesson SD40VE, 40 Caliber Pistol, One (1) Springfield Armory Model XD9 Pistol, One (1) Taurus PT 740, 40 Caliber Pistol, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Declaration of DEA TFO Adam Gibbons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(wld) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
