Progressive Commercial Advantage Agency v. Bolin et al
| Progressive Commercial Advantage Agency |
| David G. Bolin, David G. Bolin doing business as Glenn Bolin's Towing, Bolin's Corporation, Mason Dedeaux and John and Jane Does 1-10 |
| 1:2023cv00116 |
| May 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Taylor B McNeel |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil Case Terminated, pursuant to the Notice of Dismissal filed on 5/31/23. (JCH) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Progressive Commercial Advantage Agency (Heidelberg, Cecil) |
Filing 3
ORDER Requiring Briefing on Subject-matter Jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 5/15/2023 (TS)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to David G. Bolin, David G. Bolin (Individually), Bolin's Corporation, Mason Dedeaux. (RLW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David G. Bolin, David G. Bolin(Individually), Bolin's Corporation, Mason Dedeaux, John and Jane Does 1-10 (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number 5111090), filed by Progressive Commercial Advantage Agency (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (RLW) |
| Remark: Original issued summonses for service and return were emailed to attorney. (RLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
