Fiorentino v. Nelson
| Eric Jason Fiorentino, Jr. |
| Tyrone Nelson |
| Pro Se Department |
| 1:2023cv00154 |
| June 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Halil S Ozerden |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: Clerk shall mail pro se Petitioner Eric Jason Fiorentino, Jr., form 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and that Petitioner shall complete the form and file it with the Court no later than 8/30/23. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 8/16/23. (RLW)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER *RESTRICTED* granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on August 16, 2023. (RHP)
|
|
Filing 3
*RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eric Jason Fiorentino, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (RLW)
|
|
Filing 2
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Eric Jason Fiorentino, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment) (RLW)
|
|
Filing 1
ORDER: Fiorentinos habeas claims are severed from his claims under Sec. 1983. Clerk shall open a new civil action under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 in the Southern Division on Fiorentinos habeas claims. See Order for more detail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 6/21/23. (RLW)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
