Reese v. Mississippi Department of Corrections
| Howard Reese, II |
| Mississippi Department of Corrections |
| Pro Se Department |
| 1:2023cv00166 |
| July 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Louis Guirola |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AUTHORIZATION FOR RELEASE OF ACCOUNT INFORMATION AND CERTIFICATE by Howard Reese, II (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JCH) |
Filing 3
ORDER: on or before 8/9/2023, plaintiff shall either pay the required filing fee or file a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, specifically the section entitled Certificate to Be Completed by Authorized Officer of prisoner accounts or file an affidavit specifically stating the name of the prison official contacted concerning the Certificate and why this information is not provided to this court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 7/10/2023 (CRT)
|
| Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Howard Reese, II (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (RLW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mississippi Department of Corrections, filed by Howard Reese, II (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment) (RLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
