Byram v. Gulf Coast Pre-Stress Partners, LTD et al
| Robert Keith Byram and Robert Byram |
| Gulf Coast Pre-Stress Partners, LTD and Kenneth Boggs |
| 1:2023cv00170 |
| July 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Halil S Ozerden |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Kenneth Boggs, Gulf Coast Pre-Stress Partners, LTD. (wld) |
| Issued summons emailed to Eric J. Hessler at email address on docket. (wld) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Robert Keith Byram.(Hessler, Eric) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 3. 1.) Incorrect division listed. The correct division that should have been listed is "Southern". 2.) The correct format for the case number is 1:23cv170 HSO-BWR 3.) When filing the amended complaint, "all defendants" should not have been selected, each individual defendant should have been selected. (JCH) |
Filing 2
ORDER requiring Plaintiff Robert Keith Byram to establish subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on July 20, 2023. (ENW)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Kenneth Boggs, Gulf Coast Pre-Stress Partners, LTD ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 5160066), filed by Robert Keith Byram. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wld) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
