Baughman et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. 20SSIU107759.2 et al
| Randy Baughman and Michael James Dixon |
| Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. 20SSIU107759.2 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. VAR679025R2 |
| 1:2023cv00298 |
| October 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Louis Guirola |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London from Circuit Court of George County, Mississippi, case number 23-cv-248(2). ( Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number 5253888) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(PKS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
