Hale v. Nusko
| David Hale |
| Bob C. Nusco, Jr. and Bob C. Nusko, Jr. |
| 1:2023cv00343 |
| November 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Halil S Ozerden |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bob C. Nusko, Jr, filed by David Hale.(Herrington, Brian) |
| Filing 6 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 2/21/2024 at 9:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath. (AB) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Bob C. Nusko, Jr (Armer, Tristan) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by Bob C. Nusko, Jr (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2- Demand Letter, #3 Exhibit 3- Affidavit, #4 Exhibit 4- Photos of Premises)(Armer, Tristan) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Hale. Bob C. Nusko, Jr served on 12/6/2023, answer due 12/27/2023. (Herrington, Brian) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Bob C. Nusko, Jr. (JCH) |
| Issued summons emailed to attorney (JCH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bob C. Nusko, Jr. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 5280112), filed by David Hale. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wld) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
