Graybar Electric Company, Inc. v. Calgon Carbon Corporation
Graybar Electric Company, Inc. |
Calgon Carbon Corporation |
1:2023cv00366 |
December 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Taylor B McNeel |
Robert P Myers |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by Calgon Carbon Corporation (Alexander, Roderick) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #14 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant's reply is now due 2/21/2024. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE FROM THIS COURT. Signed by District Judge Taylor B. McNeel on 2/12/2024. (RGK) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr on February 8, 2024 (pl) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Gretchen L. Jankowski to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number AMSSDC-5330916) by Calgon Carbon Corporation (Attachments: #1 Attachment Certificate of Good Standing)(Alexander, Roderick) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Graybar Electric Company, Inc. (Carson, Dorsey) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr on February 6, 2024 (pl) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Gerald E. Burns to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number AMSSDC-5328822) by Calgon Carbon Corporation (Attachments: #1 Attachment Certificate of Good Standing)(Alexander, Roderick) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Calgon Carbon Corporation (Alexander, Roderick) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by Calgon Carbon Corporation (Alexander, Roderick) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Calgon Carbon Corporation (Alexander, Roderick) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Defendant Calgon Carbon Corporation's answer or other responsive pleading is due 1/24/2024. No further written order will issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr on January 16, 2024 (pl) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Calgon Carbon Corporation (Alexander, Roderick) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Defendant Calgon Carbon Corporation's answer or other responsive pleading is due 1/17/2024. No further written order will issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr on January 9, 2024 (pl) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathryn P. Goff on behalf of Graybar Electric Company, Inc. (Goff, Kathryn) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Graybar Electric Company, Inc.. Calgon Carbon Corporation served on 12/20/2023, answer due 1/10/2024. (Carson, Dorsey) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Calgon Carbon Corporation. (wld) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Calgon Carbon Corporation ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number 5294060), filed by Graybar Electric Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Purchase Order, #2 Exhibit B-Invoice 9332369577, #3 Exhibit C-Bond to Discharge Lien, #4 Exhibit D-Non-Bonded Lien, #5 Exhibit E-Amended Non-Bonded Lien, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(wld) |
Issued summons emailed to Dorsey R. Carson, Jr. at email address on docket. (wld) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.