Coleman v. Accurate Background, LLC
| Edwin Tyrone Coleman |
| Accurate Background, LLC |
| 1:2024cv00033 |
| February 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Louis Guirola |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 5/6/2024 at 9:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath. (AB) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Accurate Background, LLC.(Steadman, Joseph) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. That Attorney Yitzchak Zelman be admitted pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Plaintiff Edwin Tyrone Coleman in association with local counsel conditioned upon completion of the registration procedures found on the Court's website and at the following link: https://www.mssd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions-page. NO FURTHER ORDER WILL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 3/11/2024 (AB)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Yitzchak Zelman to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number AMSSDC-5356095) by Edwin Tyrone Coleman (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - New Jersey Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit B - New York Certificate of Good Standing)(Kittell, Christopher) |
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting Defendant Accurate Background, LLC's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #3 . Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is now 3/20/24. NO FURTHER ORDER WILL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 2/23/24 (HM)
|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Accurate Background, LLC (Steadman, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Accurate Background, LLC (Steadman, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Accurate Background, LLC. (RLW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, with jury demand, against Accurate Background, LLC (Filing fee $405.00, receipt number 5327389), filed by Edwin Tyrone Coleman (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Order from Criminal Proceeding, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (RLW) |
| Remark: Original issued summonses for service and return were emailed to attorney. (RLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Coleman v. Accurate Background, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edwin Tyrone Coleman | |
| Represented By: | Christopher E. Kittell |
| Represented By: | Yitzchak Zelman - PHV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Accurate Background, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Steadman, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
